When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.Heres how it works.
If youve ever considered turning toChatGPTfor help, youre not alone.
One of the top reported uses of ChatGPT iswriting emails.
On the surface, this makes sense.
AI can strip away messy emotions, offer a neutral perspective, and help structure arguments more clearly.
But does that mean it can help you win a debate with your friend, boss, or partner?
Why you shouldnt rely on ChatGPT to resolve conflict
Lets start with the obvious.
ChatGPT isnt human and, therefore, it lacks genuine emotional intelligence.
Michael Kane, a psychiatrist and chief medical officer at Indiana Center for Recovery.
That is a big red flag, Conrad explains.
If one person ‘wins’ and the other ‘loses,’ then you both lose.
Disagreements should be about finding resolution, not scoring points.
AI doesnt change that dynamic, it might even make it worse.
And (would you believe it?)
somehow, it always seemed to side with her.
Couples need to find a way for both people to walk away feeling good about the disagreement.
If one person dominates the other, youre creating a feeling of disconnection, Conrad explains.
Beyond that, AI may sound confident, but that doesnt mean its right.
We already know it can get things wrong, even hallucinate (make up information).
This is because it generates responses based on probabilities rather than deep understanding.
That can be useful, but its also a major limitation, especially in emotionally complex situations.
A romantic partner and a drunken stranger saying the same words convey entirely different meanings.
AI lacks the depth to truly mediate between two people with different life experiences and emotional responses.
One major advantage is that it can help you organize your thoughts.
High-stress situations can make it difficult to articulate what we mean, and AI can assist with that.
It can also serve as a useful brainstorming tool.
AI can sometimes offer a neutral perspective.
ChatGPT can be a great tool to help reframe your points in a calmer, less accusatory tone.
Like therapy, using AI for support is fine, but outsourcing the entire emotional process?
For me, context is everything.
A disagreement with a romantic partner, where honesty and authenticity matter most?
I wouldnt dream of using AI.
Navigating a workplace conflict where I want to double-check my tone?
Even then, it might not just be about context its about the nature of the argument itself.
Using AI as a mediator in a relationship feels wrong to me.
Especially for those who cant afford relationship counseling.
Still, that assumes AI has some all-knowing wisdom.
And we know it doesnt.
So where does that leave us?
I like LaMelas advice to see this like cooking.
Using ChatGPT to win an argument is a bit like seasoning your cooking with salt, she says.
Use it thoughtfully, and it can enhance clarity, smooth out bitterness, and help avoid burning bridges.
But too much reliance on AI, and you’re just serving up something artificial and gross.
So, should you use ChatGPT to win an argument?
But can it help you communicate more clearly and approach discussions with more balance?
