When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.Heres how it works.
Theyre both focused on multimedia, with varying capabilities for generating content like images, videos and other graphics.
All four images looked remarkably similar, and Krampus was holding similar items each time.
Midjourneys results were far more appealing, with plenty more variety.
The AI also played with lighting and added people to give the images more context.
It was substantially quicker to produce its results, too.
All four options looked remarkably similar and didnt offer much in terms of variation.
On the flip side, none of Midjourneys results looked alike.
There were photorealistic and painted results drawn to a variety of styles, offering a range of options.
Leonardo also took around 50% longer to produce its results, so the winner is clear.
Midjourney had slightly more variation, but both AI image generators produced usable content.
There was also a much smaller time difference between prompt and output.
In fact, the perfect challenge to trip AI up and cause it to make mistakes.
Midjourneys efforts were outstanding and almost realistic, so it certainly gets the point here.
Leonardo 30.08sMidjourney 18.63s
Leonardo 1 - Midjourney 0
Midjourney vs. Leonardo: Which is best?
Maybe cutting this down would make the systerm quicker to generate output.
Midjourney proved much better at handling complex requests, and put up a strong fight till the very end.
