And, if you use it, this is a Copilot+ PC for those embracing Microsofts version of AI.
However, most Core Ultra 200 series laptops appear to need one.
Taking the Core Ultra 7 268V processor option adds another 200.
The top option using the same 268V CPU costs $2,149.
Really, Intel has imagination?
Well, thats a revelation that I didnt have on my bingo phrases card for 2025.
So you may be wondering whats not so good with the X9-14.
There is only one significant annoyance: the lack of ports.
Overall, with the exception of the poor port selection, the X9-14 is a well-made and effective design.
But at least these might get some use on Mini PCs that use this platform eventually.
The screen is a notch above the norm, and so is the webcam.
If you dont trust the software shutter, some tape may be required.
These machines compete in the same ultra-laptop business space, even if the pricing isnt incredibly close.
In short, paying much more for the Core Ultra 7 268V would seem silly.
I have no definitive answer to why the Lenovo machine is faster at solving graphics problems.
Neither path is definitive; it all depends on how you envision using a laptop.
At this price point, the performance of this hardware is acceptable.
Its robustly made, simple, and direct to use.
It has an excellent trackpad and keyboard, and the screen is ideal for working on detailed documents.
Trading battery life for performance makes the machine more suitable for creatives and enhances the user experience.
I still think the whole AI PC concept is missing a killer use.
Should you buy a Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14?
Im sure better AI solutions that dont use local processing are available, but the choice is yours.
For more options, we reviewed thebest Dell laptops.
