When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.Heres how it works.

CTO and Co-Founder at Iris.ai.

Traditional evaluation metrics, while scientifically rigorous, can be misleading or irrelevant for business use cases.

Consider Perplexity, a common metric that measures how well a model predicts sample text.

A model might achieve excellent Perplexity scores while failing to generate practical, business-appropriate responses.

However, inbusinesscontexts where creativity and problem-solving are valued, adhering strictly to reference texts may be counterproductive.

The data quality dilemma

Another challenge of model evaluation stems from training data sources.

Mostopen sourcemodels are heavily trained on synthetic data, often generated by advanced models like GPT-4.

While this approach enables rapid development and iteration, it presents several potential issues.

When training and evaluation rely on synthetic data, these biases can become amplified and harder to detect.

This offers several advantages, including improved performance on specialized tasks and better alignment with company-specific requirements.

However, fine-tuning is not without its challenges.

The process requires high-quality, domain-specific data and can be both resource-intensive and technically challenging.

A critical factor in context sensitivity evaluation is understanding how models perform on synthetic versus real-world data.

Phi models present yet another consideration, as they can sometimes deviate from given instructions.

Task-specific performance should be assessed based on scenarios directly relevant to the business’s needs.

Operational considerations, including technical requirements,infrastructureneeds, and scalability, play a crucial role.

Enterprises should also consider implementing continuous monitoring to detect when model performance deviates from expected norms in production environments.

This is often more valuable than initial benchmark scores.

AsAI toolscontinue to iterate and proliferate, business strategies regarding their valuation and adoption must become increasingly nuanced.

When designing evaluation frameworks, organizations should be mindful of the data sources used for testing.

Relying too heavily on synthetic data for evaluation can create a false sense of model capability.

Successful model evaluation lies in recognizing that publicly available benchmarks and metrics are just the beginning.

We list the best Large Language Models (LLMs) for coding.

The views expressed here are those of the author and are not necessarily those of TechRadarPro or Future plc.

If you are interested in contributing find out more here:https://www.techradar.com/news/submit-your-story-to-techradar-pro